The life quality people enjoy improved as time goes by. I concur with the fact that people enjoy a higher quality of life today than sixty years ago when my grandparents were teenagers. I thinke this change happened because of the availablity of abundent food and higher education.
To begin with, people nowadays have no worry about hungry because they can easily access to plenty of food, which was scarce druing my grandparents' childhood. In the 1940s China was undergo civil war and people can hardly feed them full. This situation gradually changed after China joined the WTO in 2002 when commodities suddenly appeared in vast number. I remembered my life changed better when I was twelve years old because I was able to eat meat more often than before. Before China's membership of the WTO, the only chance for people to enjoy a feast was during a celebration when meat was proffered in banquet. Nowadays, people can buy various kinds of meat in supermarket with affordable price, and people nowadays have to consider to lose weight due to unbalanced diet dominantly on meat. Without question, people nowadays do not worry about deflated belly like people lived in 20th centry.
Moreover, people at comtemporary era own effortless access to education, especially higher education. People before 1980s in China almost have no chance to study in school. One reason is that the family cannot afford the tuition, another reason is that the child are need to help in farmwork because extra hand was need in farmland to yield more food for the starving family. My grandparents are both unliterated due to the complex enviornment of their childhood. Nonetheless, the attitude towards education changed in last two decades when children are encouraged to study in school and supported by family. My cousins and me all finished tertiary education. A higher education provides better opportunity to a decent job and live a higher quality of life.
To summarize, I strongly agree that people today enjoy an easier and more comfortable life than people of sixty years ago. One reason is that people now have easy access to plenty food and do not need to worried about starvation, and the other reason is that people nowadays have chance to pursue higher education that facilitates a higher quality of life.
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 48
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'undergone'.
Suggestion: undergone
...rents childhood. In the 1940s China was undergo civil war and people can hardly feed th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider losing'.
Suggestion: consider losing
...able price, and people nowadays have to consider to lose weight due to unbalanced diet dominantl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nonetheless, so, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9974025974 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57690090671 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522077922078 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9500235265 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.263157895 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155538959918 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518123302877 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052317582208 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109418561573 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216630946159 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.