is the teenage lady in the portrait is jane austin
Both the lecturer and the reading passage are talking about the possibility that the teenage lady in the portrait owned by Austin family is jane, according to the reading passage the jane is the lady in the portrait. On the other hand, the lecturer strongly disagree with this idea. The lecturer says that none of the reading evidence in the reading passage is convenience that jane is the lady in the portrait and gives us several counterclaims to support his point of view.
The first point the lecturer makes is that the Austin family’s member whom confirm that the lady in the portrait is jane did not see her. According to the lecturer jane dead many years before the person authorized that the portrait for her. Eventually, this person could not be consider a good authorizer. On the other hand, the reading passage that Austin family illustrate that the teenage lady in the portrait is Austin. So, this is a convenience evidence.
Another point the lecturer makes to cast doubt on the reading is Austin family was very extended family. The lecturer claims that when jane was teenage there were many teenage girls in her family. So, the probability that there were many girls resemble jane and at the same age of her makes it hard tobe sure that the lady in portrait is jane. However, the reading passage states that the lady in the portrait looks like the adult girl in the jane portrait.
Finally, the professor states that the portrait’s style is humphory style. In addition, the stamp on the back of portrait confirm that such style sold in londan when jane was younger than the lady in the portrait. This contradict the reading passage because it is only says that the portrait painted by humphuer who hire to pain for the wealthy family such us Austin family and that was when jane was teenage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-09 | Shahadattar | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, so, in addition, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7665615142 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38923121482 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400630914826 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3685969187 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530956443674 0.236089414692 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202305397485 0.076458572812 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158703550244 0.0737576698707 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385712170649 0.150856017488 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06328970365 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.