some people think that government should give financial support to artists, musicians and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. discuss both views and give your opinion
Government grant for artists, musicians and poets is a controversial topic in today's society. Advocates believe that policy makers should take serious note on providing finance for these groups of people. However, I am of the opinion that this could cause a drain on state budget.
On the one hand, there are several reasons for the public to speculate on the idea of government intervention. Admitedly, artists, musicians and poets play a vital role in a country's culture and wellbeing. An explanation of this is that their works of arts foster our imagination, curiousity, creativity and cultural understandings. In addition, it is widely accepted that famous artists, musicians and poets bring about huge financial benefits for their countries. For instance, paintings of well-known artistsin museums attract thousands of visitors every year, resulting in new job opportunities for communities and sources of income for governments. This may mean that those people can indirectly create wellness for the country as a whole and its people.
On the other hand, I am convinced that this can place a burden on countries on a tight budget. This is due to the fact that numerous sectors are awaiting to be granted such as health, agricuture, education, to name just a few. Take Vietnam as an example. Every year, the government have to spend a large amount of money for dealing with natural disasters and public health. If governments place high value on arts, musics and poetries, it is likelihood that other sectors will be suffered. Another reason to be concerned is that artists, musicians and poets are, in a way, equal to workers, farmers and the population in general. Thereby, it is not a viable approach to finance those people soly and leave others out of the race.
To conclude, while some people argue that artists, musicians and poets deserved a place in financial support, I would content that public spending should be used wisely and efficiently on other important sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | phuoguyenn | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-11 | hdmiasus1602 | 78 | view |
- some people think that government should give financial support to artists, musicians and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of spots facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own o 88
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 79
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, I am convinced that this can place a burden on countries on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1226993865 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83037592727 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573619631902 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.785497523 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2352941176 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160579589163 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500737879048 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477495295346 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114066863907 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494575793711 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.