These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude?
Recently, there are enormous of human like throwing old materials away instead of fixing it, and using it again. This technique can help them to save money. According to the development process in the world, people prefer to buy new material which it might support them and making their life easily. The use of high technology machines or particles, it will be as a facility to comfort themselves ultimately.
However, repairing the damaged machines, it is inevitable, that it will damage again. As a result, it may make their so complicated, and they get nervous while functioning the old one. So different of views in life have been developed in mutiple areas. Although, people in the past have no choice to purchase new machines due to no further technology development and lower income alike. For example, wooden saw is being used for cutting wood. in case of damage, human prefer to shapen and functioning it again. In addition, it will not be more effiecient as before. Besides, it may take to make the job done in short time. As it will need more effort to put on for achieving the target.
On the contrary, due to the development of technology, people go through buying the best items to relieve themselves. As we mentioned before, the manual wooden saw, if this machine has been destroyed and it became too old. Consequently, people would have bought the latest technology item of this version. So they will undoubtedly purchase the electric machine, so that they will achive their work faster and comfortable. For example, there is well establishe company produce the highest technology edition of these machines and its namd Cat. It inroduce good materials for human use. As it seeks to reach customers satisfatcion while functioning it. Furthermore, it offers a kind of maintenance of its equipment in case of being machine damaged.
To sum up, the past is totally different from the present. People go through whatever they like. And purchasing the best items of such well reputed company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-12 | Hussein1987 | 78 | view |
- Unversity students should pay in full, for their own education instead of the society funding their study. The reason is that individuals tend to benefit after graduation more than the society.To what extent do you agree or disagree?! And give your own op 56
- Children are being exploited all over the world for beggary found in harmful factories and in unhealthy situations 63
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 56
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 78
- Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. They should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...den saw is being used for cutting wood. in case of damage, human prefer to shapen ...
^^
Line 6, column 586, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... inroduce good materials for human use. As it seeks to reach customers satisfatcio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in short, kind of, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72381588918 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565088757396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3255484516 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.8333333333 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45833333333 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163356694219 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441888594144 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392592201755 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980447140396 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250810080134 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.