The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers.
The charts show learning purposes and benefits for workers grouped by their ages. Overall, most of the younger people study to get a job and get more support from their employer.
For the study reason, 80 of 90 students under 26 is studying for their career, leaving only around 10 of them to study for their own interest. However, they pursue their passion more than career as old as they get, until the number of people with different academic objectives is balanced in group of 40 to 49 years old at 40 for each purposes. Finally, 70 students choose to get an education to satisfy their interest, while less than 20 of them is learning for their work needs.
Meanwhile, job supports are starting high for employee under 26 years old with the score of 63. Next, it noticably dropped to 51 when they are entering ages of 26 to 29. The trend continues until they reach the ages of 30 to 39 at 33 points. Then the trend is starting to reversed, as the score is slightly increasing to 38 points when they are at group of ages 40 to 49. Lastly the number rise to 45 points for employees older than 49 years old.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-13 | annatran12324 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 84 | view |
| 2017-06-21 | elirya | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. Write a report for a university lecturer, d 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
- Today more and more students are deciding to move to a different country for higher studies Do you think that the benefits of this outweigh the problems 90
- Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? 61
- e live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweighs the advantages.To what extent do you agree ? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, lastly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41262135922 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27290760131 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6712742422 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256690543099 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100539973491 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490691329805 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172201824104 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245206674454 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.