A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Factories in a city can influence our lives greatly since they have both positive effects such as increasing the opportunities for work and earn more tax for the town as well as negative effects such as pollution of the environment. Nowadays some people may hold the opinion that if a company wants to spend money for a city, it is better to spend that on arts as if it is a general truth. But to be frank, I cannot agree with them. I strongly believe that it should spend money on environmental aspects for the following reasons.
Firstly, in that way companies reduce the harm that they produce for the city. One of the most important problems a factory is caused is pollution of the nature due to various harmful gases which it produces. Spending money on the environment drops this effect so much. For example, Araz, which is a food firm in my town, brings about many health problems such as different diseases since it produces a good deal of Carbon Dioxide gas. Our government stopped its production as a result of of this problem and forced it to improve its tools. If the company spends money to help the environment, it changes individuals’ attitude towards the company and decreases the rate of harmfulness gases.
Secondly, spending money on the environment helps people to be healthier. Water pollution is a common problem in factories. Companies’ harmful remains are usually put into a river and cause a lot of illnesses. Aftab is a car company in Pakistan. The existence of this firm is produced numerous diseases such as chest cancer for the persons who live near this firm according to Tehran news. Individuals suffer from this problem because they use water polluted by this company. As you can see, spending money to make the Earth condition, water pollution for example, better helps humans to be healthier.
Finally, art is also extremely important for our lives. By using beautiful pictures as well as placards in a city, it looks more beautiful. Also, it helps our country to earn more money since beauty attracts more tourists. Moreover, it is a well-known statement that "beauty or something artistic makes people happier". Therefore, people have a happier life if a company spends money on the art.
In conclusion, although art is important for a better life and helps humans to be healthier, but I strongly believe that spending money on the environment causes companies benefit people more. Not only it will reduce the harm that companies are the origin of that, but also it helps people to be healthier. Therefore, if I have a factory, I do not have any doubt about spending money for making the Earth circumstances better.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment Which do you think the company should choose Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone. Others like to be with friends most of the time. Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends? Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...ment stopped its production as a result of of this problem and forced it to improve i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88596491228 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7979706184 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493421052632 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.308789881 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.12 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.24 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150040352354 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508638575631 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458865930432 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954578913206 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128263118622 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.