Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discusss both views and give you own opinion
The deterioration of air pollution is becoming an alarming issue that attracts a lot of concern. While some people reckon that by having days without car is a promising solution to mitigate the severe situation, I hold the views that there are other effective ways in the long term
On the one hand, there are several reasons to believe that the discouragement of cars for few days helps ameliorate the air contamination. Firstly, the emission of carbon dioxide from exhaust fume, which is one of the main culprits causing air pollution, is expected to drop due to restriction of vehicles. This expectation stems from the success of Earth’s hour program that has considerably contributed to the reduction of electricity consumption. Secondly, commuters would have to resort to other means of transport such as bus, bicycle, walking and so on, for cars are not allowed. This, in return, raises people’s awareness of the convenience and mobility of public transport system and subsequently, these alternatives might become their preferred choice in the future
On the other hand, I believe that there exists other measures that are as much feasible and rational. Government are advised to impose higher environmental taxes on private vehicles, which make them less affordable. Only when less number of car circulates on the road would a decline in carbon dioxide be guaranteed, leading to a cleaner atmosphere. Besides, improving the public transport service and facility is a workable proposal. Should the public transport becomes friendlier, more convenient and reliable, more commutters will be appealed. In addtion, government should allocate a sufficient fund in researching and developing of environmental friendly vehicles. As such, commutters can still enjoy the benefits of cars while the emission of air pollutant is controlled.
In conclusion, having days on which car use are prohibited is conducive to the society. However, government should also focus and combine other measures to alleviate the severity of air pollution.
- It is believed that there are as many as 1800 rare plants and animals on Earth. Should we protect the endanged species? Agree disagree? 80
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen This is extremely harmful to their development Therefore parent should strictly limit the time that children spend in this way To what extent do you agree 84
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 77
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
- The purpose of conducting scientific research projects is for practical use rather than for the sake of doing research itself. Do you agree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their preferred choice in the future On the other hand, I believe that there ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.425 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0646612272 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8208158672 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194150796715 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545984526759 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626807118922 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136189475582 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716020608683 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.