Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are myriad factors or considerations which take into account that to work solely on the projects are beneficial than with partners. As far as I am concerned, according to the following reasons and some of my personal experience, I am of the conviction that pupils learn more when they work together. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The reasons will be explored in the following essay.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my viewpoint is related with experience. Students learn various things by working together. My experience is a good example of this. In my school days, I was a very shy girl. I often don't like to talk to other. When my teacher gave a chemistry group project and divide the class into four group, five members in each group. At starting, I feel nervous to work with the team member, but after few days I feel comfortable with them. I gave the idea for the project and many of the students became good friends of mine. It was a great experience for me. Moreover, in group works, pupils can share their thoughts to their partners, and they can make good friends for the lifetime by working together.
Apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that is pertaining to obtaining huge experiences. The noteworthy refreshing intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in my country show that the majority of people agree that they learn more effectively by working with others. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of the study done in Delhi university, a lot of students allocate their valuable time in working with other students. It enhances their interaction with other students and they do well on their research paper when they assign to work in groups.
Admittedly, someone may have justifications that by working alone give them more freedom. They can bring their idea for the project. They did not have to depend on others for the work. Working in groups is like a two-edged sword: on the one hand, by working with others give more thought for the project, on the other hand, students should have to dependent on others for their work.I still affirm that working with others give more benefit than alone.
In summary, by all aforementioned reasons, one can infer that working with others are more suitable than work solely. Pupils can learn a variety of things from others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | Aswath Madhubabu | 71 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | toefl 2019 | 3 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | toefl 2019 | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-15 | Aza Baghdasaryan | 61 | view |
| 2017-04-11 | arti chauhan | 75 | view |
- TPO 30 Integrated Writing Task 81
- TPO 24 Integrated Writing Task 52
- TPO 17 Integrated Writing Task 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement There are times when lying is acceptable 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ol days, I was a very shy girl. I often dont like to talk to other. When my teacher ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...e to dependent on others for their work.I still affirm that working with others g...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, i feel, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 30.3222958057 228% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1373.03311258 148% => OK
No of words: 418.0 270.72406181 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87559808612 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58766756804 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9205492483 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9166666667 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355941887282 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968593867696 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768863358178 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207965760579 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393145512299 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.