It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural
environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this
development?
In recent decades, there have been a growing trend towards traveling to
remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might
be of great concern to some environmental activists, scientists and thrillseekers
should still be encouraged to study and explore there.
Scientists in different branches need to travel to remote natural
environment like South Pole to study and protect it. This benefits not only
those who do the research themselves but also the society as a whole as
there will be solutions to many global problems such as climate change.
Second, most scientists travel to remote natural areas in efforts to learn
how to protect them from other humans. In fact, if no pertinent data about
the interaction of humans and the environment is collected for research
and made known to the public, even innocent people can inadvertently
damage the areas.
There are also a number of benefits for tourists traveling to isolated natural environment. One of those benefits is that natural areas offer one of-a-kind traveling experience to visitors. For example, those who decide to take a vacation to South Pole will be able to immerse in the wilderness and the atmosphere that are entirely different from the world they know.In addition, by staying inside a natural environment, tourists will be able
to develop a higher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of
tourists and students have chosen to become environmental advocates
or even activists after a trip to the wilderness, which helps raise the public
awareness on the issue.
In conclusion, traveling to remotes natural areas benefits students,
scientists and the world at large in a variety of ways. As long as there is
no disruption to the original state of nature, everyone should be
welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-16 | grahamoneil | 67 | view |
| 2017-04-16 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent you agree or disagree. 67
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 76
- -Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country. Do you think this brings more advantages or disadvantages to the people who follow this path? 56
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...rely different from the world they know.In addition, by staying inside a natural e...
^^
Line 17, column 55, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...igher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and students have chosen to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the public awareness on the issue. In conclusion, traveling to remotes natura...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26279863481 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83114802351 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542662116041 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7391163385 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200590993513 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784931636397 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557068019643 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0539407641909 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485589368661 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.