The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
A glance at the graph given reveals how many books men and women read at Burnaby library during the period between 2011 and 2014.
In overall, men tended to read more and more books over the 4-year period whereas the number of books read by their female counterparts dropped.
In the first third of the surveyed period, there was a slight increase in the number of books read by males from just over 2000 to 4000 books. However, in just one year, that number rose up significantly by 6000 to 10000, and by 2014, men have read 14000 books.
As for the females, from 2011 to 2013, the number of books read grew gradually from over 4000 to 10000 in 2 years. Nevertheless, women tended to read less compared to the last 2-year period, which made the number decrease steeply to around 8000 throughout the last year in the surveyed period.
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 90
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impo 62
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 70
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, third, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 692.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58278145695 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1983563161 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2426457862 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263270073406 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145148263108 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926979703141 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181833162906 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917858988228 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.