Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
The young generation is the most important part of each society. It is necessary that governments provide a good condition for their participation. Many people have this view that youth does not give enough time to helping their communities. However, others hold the opposite view that young people have time to helping communities. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelming. Among the two opinions, I agree with the former one more. I believe that youth spend their time to study, and their families so that they do not have more time to helping communities.
First and foremost, if young generation studies in colleges or universities, they would not enough time to other things. I insist that youth should study hard and do not waste their time with other issues. Because education is an open corridor to success in life so that we should encourage youth to study and it will have advantages not only for them but also the society. For example, my friend liked to help communities and she did not pay attention to her studies. After a while, she considered that she did not take advantage of it and she achieved a low grade. Thus, she changed her plan to will be successful in her studies.
Second, another thing deserves some words here. Young generation should spend their time with family. Parents play an important role for their children and all the members of the family are with each other in different time. For instance, when my father suffered a disease, I want to participate in one community. Thus, I changed my plan to visit my father and spend time with him because he had a major value for me.
To sum up, from what I discussed above, I safely come to this conclusion that youth nowadays do not give enough time to helping communities. Because they have important priorities like their education and family. As a result, they do not give enough time to helping communities. Therefore, I agree with this statement.
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 61
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. The invasion of the zebra mussel 80
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, another thing, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83775811209 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67455824501 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498525073746 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0811055783 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5454545455 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436946113129 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12930583126 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158461815497 0.0737576698707 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284014587603 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168294877919 0.0645574589148 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.