In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Nowadays people can use different tools to get information which the advance of technology provides these useful tools such as the Internet and different channels of television. Many people deem that a person must get information from many different news resources if he/she wants to be well-informed. However, other people hold the opposite view that people do not confuse with various news resources. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelming. Among the two opinions, I agree with the later one more. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
To begin with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that today each news resource has a specific view so that they report different news which they believe them. For this reason, if people get information from different resources and then do not think about their reality. As an example, during the war between Iran and Iraq, foreign new resources reported the news that Iranian new resources had the opposite news. Therefore, people listened to the different news and they did not know which one is one is true and it made the problem for them in the bad condition of war. Moreover, people face stress with this different news and they cannot make a reasonable decision. Take myself as an example, when I wanted to buy gold earnings, I checked the price of the gold in different resources and I was confused so that I could not know about the real price of gold.
Second, there is another reason which deserves some words here. Today, people should do various things in a short time so that they do not waste their time. Therefore, if people want to get information from many different news resources, they will spend a lot of time to do this issue and it makes problems like decreasing their job's efficiency because they do not get a great news and take wrong decisions and these mistakes have a bad impact on their career. For example, if a leader of a company does not have a special resource, he/ she will waste time to understand the reality of different news resources.
To wrap it up, from what I discussed above, I safely come to this conclusion that it is important that people follow the dissimilar new resources and find a valid resource. To summarize the reasons, not only can the different news resources confuse people easily but also waste their time. Thus, I disagree with this statement.
- a buzzer 73
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 79
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 70
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 66
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that a person must get information from many different news resources if he/she wants to be we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one is'.
Suggestion: one is
...ferent news and they did not know which one is one is true and it made the problem for them i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... if people want to get information from many different news resources, they will spend a lot o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84976525822 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62603358138 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8587209381 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.736842105 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300838851065 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940937723437 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136544124833 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188201694533 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975666091944 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.