The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010
The map shows the changes that have taken place at the village of Stokeford during an 80-year period from 1930 to 2010.
It is clear that the biggest change that happened was the number of houses increased dramatically. Additionally, farmland had completely disappeared by 2010.
In 1930, there were a few houses on both sided of the only road which ran through the middle of the village. More streets were built, and housing was extended along the main road in 2010, while the local shops were located in the northeast of the area but it was demolished.
In addition, two areas of farmland to the southeast and northeast of the village were destroyed to make way for residential areas. Meanwhile, the local primary school located opposite the Post office was widened with two blocks. Garden formed the center of the village in 1930 but more houses had been constructed by 2010 on this site and the large house within the grounds was expanded to become a retirement home.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 11
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the northeast of the area but it was demolished. In addition, two areas of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80357142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48560909055 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.035345404 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169797250089 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721919679233 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966748364359 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119418567378 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112803932179 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.