The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.
The maps show the developments that occurred at Queen Mary hospital during a 40-year period from 1960 to 2000.
It is clear from the maps that the biggest change that happened at the hospital was the construction of a cancer center. Additionally, a shopping center and farmland had completely disappeared by 2000.
In 1960, the hospital was located in the south of the main road. There was a shopping center to the northwest corner, but this center was demolished in 1980 to make way for a cancer center and a pharmacy. Farmland was also destroyed and replaced by a nursing school, while a car park in the southeast area still existed.
Between 1980 and 2010, the cancer center was dramatically extended, and the nursing school was moved a little to the east, forcing the car park to become smaller. Meanwhile, the pharmacy and the hospital still remained close to the main road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | karan dadral | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | MaganpreetSingh | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 22 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Shivani Jani | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Hoang Luan | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- the chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 93
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82236842105 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63695995902 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8866374829 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13838345833 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735458468352 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910532929855 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109854330527 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909619043029 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.