Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, by progressing the technology, some people try to have broad knowledge in different subjects especially the academic subjects, while others have a negative attitude toward it. The world is changing every second and if we want to separate yourself from other people, we might have a better knowledge rather than the other. As far as I am concerned, I agree with above statement because of several reasons including having more incomes in life and having good status in the society.
Having more earning is the first reason of current discussion. In this regard, it should be noted that if we have skills to do different works, we will have more incomes. In other words, we need to have a broad knowledge of different academic subjects to attain different skills and thus more incomes. With this harsh economic situation, we need to get more money rather than before and it never happens with having knowledge of a specific academic subject. For instance, my friend is a civil engineer and have knowledge of math academic subject as well as engineering. So, he can get money by teaching math beside of his working for an engineering company. Therefore, one of the momentous reason of having a broad knowledge of many academic subjects is about having more incomes in life.
Another noteworthy of ongoing discussion is about having good status in social life. Research showed that well academic person is regarded more than a person who has no academic experience. So, if we have more academic experience, we would have a higher status in society. Imagine that you have a family gathering and all talk about different subjects. If you have no experience in that subjects, you will be disappointed about yourself, and vice versa. For instance, I can vividly remember that it was a hot afternoon in summer and we went to my uncle's house. There was a technical problem in his refrigerator and we all were thirsty. My brother was a soccer player but he had an academic knowledge of electronic and thus he could solve the problem. All family appreciated him and regarded him more than before. Thus, having good status in the society is another reason of having knowledge of many academic subjects.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally reach the conclusion that although it is hard to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects but it is so helpful because it improves our incomes and elaborates our status in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | meet96300 | 90 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | sohamangal0407 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-05 | Afruzi | 94 | view |
| 2020-09-27 | elaheh eskandari | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 15 3
- TPO 32 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90384615385 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65387663723 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466346153846 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.110856831 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8095238095 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295863913727 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993382474363 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777925651265 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193730934153 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617154591853 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.