Agree/Disagree Q. If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life.
From a broad perspective, in the current states of affairs we face, in which success in life becomes the ultimate goal for almost all of the people, it is not far-fetched to presume that individuals try their best in order to take advantages of their strengths to achieve their targets. However, what is the role of public opinion in terms of their awareness of the achievements is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend that understanding the other people of the accomplishments has guaranteed the future success. I personally concur with this idea and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this statement will be elaborated.
First and foremost, the nature of human is a social creature and subsequently deeply affected by the other people. There is no denying the fact that there is a wide array of the definition of the word "success". Despite the various existed definition, the common concept among them is the further consequence of being successful which is undoubtedly contentment in life. Needless to say that rarely is satisfying in life companion with loneliness. Indeed, getting pleasure of their achievement, people usually incline to share their happiness with others. Therefore, so critical is this sense of gratification for them that it will be meaningless if other people do not know regarding their success. Furthermore, the need of human for being admired and appreciated. Compare two superlative students in the third grade of elementary school as an example. The first one has lived in a family which do not pay attention to their child success, and another one who frequently introduce as the most excellent student in the school. It goes without saying that the no matter what age people have, human requires enough incentive in order to make more effort and the others opinions intensify their determination.
Another crucial point which should be taken into consideration is the impact of public awareness attentive other strengths. In fact, successful, to a great extent, is closely associated with the other people's mindset toward that particular achievement. In the other words, this is people that introduce each other actions as strengths or weaknesses. Consequently, by eliminating the people factor from the process of achievement is like growing a fruitful and beautiful tree in a remote plain. Absolutely the result is perfect but it is meaningless since other people cannot take advantages of using it. That is why people should not pass up their chance to present their strength in every single proper situation. Moreover, most of the opportunities arise from the other. For instance, the canny manager in a small company which is known as a talented businessman can promote readily by accepting the better jobs rather than the one who has the same intelligent without the chance to become exposed to the public view. Admittedly, the role of others in accomplishment and highlighting the strength is undeniable.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that having overlooked the others opinion regarding the achievements, people undermine their chance to become success. Not only do people get self-confidence due to their admirations and positive sense, but also they do not miss a chance to get acquainted with those who are able to provide better opportunities for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-18 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2017-11-01 | imanattari | 90 | view |
| 2017-04-29 | Delara | 90 | view |
| 2017-04-29 | Delara | 90 | view |
| 2017-04-29 | Delara | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...fe becomes the ultimate goal for almost all of the people, it is not far-fetched to presum...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nt in life. Needless to say that rarely is satisfying in life companion with loneliness. Inde...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...t, is closely associated with the other peoples mindset toward that particular achievem...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...cious to say that having overlooked the others opinion regarding the achievements, peo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, third, for instance, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2837.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 548.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17700729927 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03704188232 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 891.9 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2118147549 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.48 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.92 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211394549584 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632890307207 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514132996288 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140865111615 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191444924829 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 86.8835125448 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.