TPO45
In the reading passage, the author claims thtat there are three viable explanations regarding the impossibility of existing the bees as early as 200 million years ago due to the unearthed fossil stucture, which is discovered inside the very old fossilized tree. However, findingal the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that this idea is completely feasible.
At first, the author argues that since the eariest fossils attibuted to the bees is traced back to 100 milliion years ago, this stucture is not related to the bees. Conversely, the lecturer contend that in spite of the fact that this is a true claim, there is anothr dorable explanation for this occurrance. In fact, the bees' fossils would have been preserved in a particular cicumstance. The rare species of trees that produced resine, whcih is special substances producing sticky liquid, could abe to maintain the stucture of bees and this tree was not prevalent in that period of time.
In addition, the reading passag holds the view that the bees lives have been highly dependenet on the flowering plants, so the absence of them refure the existance of bees 200 million years ago. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this idea by clarifying the fact that the early bees might feed on none-flowering plants such as fure or pine tree. Indeed, they probably adopted to establish this biological relationship with flowreing plant, after they started germinating.
Finally, the author asserts that lack of some details inthe structure of bees\ nest such as chambers corroborate that this stucture should not be regarded as bees. The professor, thoght, repudiate this point by subscribing the fact that scientices have scrutnized the presence of particular water proof chemical substances which were constitued the chambers. In fact, this chemical ws found and endorse that chambers did exist in the bees' nests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and this tree was not prevalent in that period of time. In addition, the reading passag hol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...e scrutnized the presence of particular water proof chemical substances which were constitu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, in addition, in fact, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17981072555 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70597375864 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8912976321 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126151363856 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505083334512 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224297205576 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781013174528 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298248566327 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.