Governments should pay more on computer technology or basic needs?
Rapid changes and complexity of today’s world represent new challenges and put new demands on the societies. Nowadays, we live in an era of time that recent progress in computer industry create a revolution in the world so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that governments should pay more money to improve the computer technologies. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that numerous people get stuck in their basic but essential needs; so responding to these fundamental requirements may be counted as a top priority for the governors. I am of the opinion that each of the mentioned views has their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, the continuous development of advanced computer technology opens up multitude opportunities for the human. Humankind has achieved to the incredible breakthrough in diverse sciences, thanks to easy availability of wide range of information, and undoubtedly, computer knowledge plays a critical role in this regard. For instance, medical science has a great accomplishment in eradicating the fatal diseases which cause longevity increases significantly. Besides, the education system has improved because both the students and the teachers have readily access to the computers that allows them to enhance the public awareness. Consequently, societies grow well-informed and knowledgeable people who will be efficient in the future. Admittedly, investing in computer field brings a lot of positive consequences for such these modern communities.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is that food, shelter, clean water and education are the radical rights for each individual, and a growing segment of people is still dealing with the fierce competition to acquire these absolute necessities. Thus, no one can overlook the miserable circumstance that some undeveloped countries encounter. For example, when citizens in South Africa must go miles away from their residence to get the water or a large crowd of young children has been deprived of attending in the standard classes; they cannot think about high-tech devices that may assist them to improve their life. They are hungry and, witness of dying their siblings who suffer from various diseases due to lack of hygiene. In this situation, all the life is summarized in being alive and the luxury words – such as computer technology – has lost their meaning.
On the basis of the points mentioned above I am convinced that this topic is a very controversial debate since it entirely depends on the place and the condition that people live. Subsequently, most of the obvious primary requisition of a person in specific region of the world may seem the most unreachable matter for someone else in another corner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 90
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 90
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life? 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- TPO 11 Integrated a decline in reading the literature 88
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255060728745 0.229887763892 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.13967611336 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113360323887 0.0866891130778 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384615384615 0.046263068375 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0283400809717 0.0685040099705 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127530364372 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0384615384615 0.0351676179071 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0174589443 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0222672064777 0.0309702414327 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00202429149798 0.00188951952338 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.119433198381 0.0887237588012 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0202429149798 0.0209618222197 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0182186234818 0.0139019557991 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2858.0 2387.08602151 120% => OK
No of words: 451.0 408.028673835 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33702882483 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392461197339 0.338922669872 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321507760532 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.248337028825 0.174417080927 142% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.168514412417 0.112833075102 149% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0174589443 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614190687361 0.524397521467 117% => OK
Word variations: 79.6399927435 59.2087087015 135% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5294117647 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.468872523 48.84282405 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.117647059 120.699889404 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5294117647 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.644075263715 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 58.6801878179 45.7405998639 128% => OK
Elegance: 2.03921568627 1.45489161554 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880924302405 0.300154397459 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.071551452553 0.103427244359 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0381554134797 0.0752933317313 51% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515381680619 0.497263757937 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136808505783 0.151897553556 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335096192153 0.114077575197 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361793548877 0.0781384742642 46% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.442142201984 0.336927656856 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0541082214948 0.067059652881 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601845730096 0.210909579961 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389358662875 0.0618886996521 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.