Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life.
From a broad perspective, in the current states of affairs we face, in which happiness can be accounted as the ultimate goal for most of the people, it is not far-fetched to presume that they are seeking to achieve it through diverse approaches. However, which of those attitudes does offer more contentment in life is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that their job brings more joyful rather than their social life. I personally concur with this idea and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, people dedicate their life to take their favorable job. There is no denying the fact that getting a decent job is of the great importance for a plethora of people. Indeed, they usually take accurate steps with the aim of raising their chance to find the proper occupation. For instance, having enrolled in the best high school, they can get admission from a reputable university. When this milestone passed, they will be able to apply for the vacant positions. Admittedly, the more qualified they are, the better job they can acquire. Therefore, it comes as no surprise if they immerse themselves in their work that they make severe effort to obtain it. Subsequently, this cycle lasts for the rest of their lives in terms of getting promotion and earning salary raises and so forth. In this circumstance that people spent virtually their entire life to accomplish career succeed, they attain remarkable pleasure from their triumph.
Another crucial point which should be taken into consideration is that social life can be a subcategory of professional life. Undoubtedly, sociability is an integral feature of prosperous individuals. Actually, they are aware of this fact that their accomplishments in their jobs, to the great extent, is dependent upon their relationships with other people. Consequently, rarely do people encounter a successful person that cannot establish the constructive relations with others. Furthermore, according to the latest research attributing Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in Department of sociology, the most long-term friendships have been formed among good colleagues. This probe provide further legitimacy for this idea that people's social life is heavily affected by their careers Thus, so interconnected is these two concepts that if people enjoy their job, they can be happy in their social life as well.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that happy life evolves from having a satisfying job. Actually, people not only occupy most of their lifetime with their job, but also they cannot distinguish the matters of job and social life owing to a fierce connection between them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-22 | zhangjuw16 | 76 | view |
- TPO 4 Integrated 3
- TPO 27 integrated writing : Little Ice Age 85
- TPO 8 3
- The bar shows men and women study full time and part time in three decades Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main featured and make comparison where relevant 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 953, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remarkable pleasure from their triumph. Another crucial point which should be ta...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17516629712 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82050718671 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558758314856 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5358501846 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391785270553 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123501985474 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12008834753 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280696641061 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519865418633 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.