Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should
encourage their children do their work independently.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which so critical are the role of parents that they form() the foundations of the children's personality. Therefore, it is not far-fetched to presume that their attribution() toward the kids' school work can be accounted as the most influential factor which builds() their characteristic. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that parents should encourage() their kids to study autonomously rather than assisting them with their home works. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the children's habitats turn to their future behaviors. There is no denying the fact that habituation() is a basis of most of the human's activities. It means that when a particular action is repeated frequently, individuals react to it unconsciously. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in the Department of at the University of Macquarie, more that 80% of the people's habitats toward specific circumstances or stimulus are coming from their experience in the first decade of their lives. This probe provides further legitimacy of this idea that parents should flourish the features in their kids that bring the most possible personality for them. Subsequently, having lead them in their assignment, parents teach their children to become independent and undoubtedly this trait will last forever with their child. While if they assist them, they children will be the dependent and undetermined people who are always seeking to get help form others.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideration is that the parenting are beyond the mere companion with the children in every single seconds of their lives. Needless to say that happy family necessitates that all the family members allocate sufficient time for their favorite action, aside from their duties. Admittedly, parents always engaging in their kids activities have no time for themselves. Take a mother that had been learned her kid to undertake the accountability of the assignments by her own and just comes to require a favor when she encounter a serious problem. It comes as no surprise that this parenting() not only augment the children's capability and breed him independent, but also allows the parents to have sufficient time for themselves to spend more efficient time together.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that encouraging() the kids to take the responsibilities of school assignments is the best approach. Regardless of the independency of the individuals in their future lives, parents find an opportunity to pass their time in the favorable way.
- TPO 4 Integrated 3
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 76
- TPO 8 - Integrated: Chevalier's memoir 3
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 37
- TPO 27 integrated writing : Little Ice Age 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'encounters'.
Suggestion: encounters
... just comes to require a favor when she encounter a serious problem. It comes as no surpr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22767857143 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96116108446 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540178571429 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1101634598 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334845948593 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109963197895 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880365779923 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213695885036 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520530017263 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.