Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill.
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all momentous changes they made in humans’ lives. Perhaps the most important milestone of these two centuries is the changes which they have made in science. There is no doubt that science has been developed dramatically and a lot of new fields of study have been created in recent decades. Besides, they have become perplexing(highly sophisticated) and intricate. A plethora of people are in the conviction that people should strengthen several abilities and have information about various subjects. Others, on the other hand, take a radically different point of view and allege that they should concentrate on a specific field and gain information about that profoundly. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
Before the modern era, human beings did not have adequate information about their environment and it was possible to be aware of the all fields of science. Scientists had several titles in the past. For instance, Avicenna, One one of the most famous Persian scientists, is known as a mathematician, physician, astronomer and philosopher. Conversely, nowadays, the amount of information which exists is incredibly high and constantly growing. The refreshingly noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) revealed that the amount of information doubles every four years. Consequently, it is not possible for a person to be knowledgeable enough in all fields. Even it is unlikely for a person to gain all information of one field. People have to use each other’s specialties in groups and don’t do not need to become an expert in all fields. That’s That is why many people believe that scientists should concentrate on a specific field.
Different fields of science are connected to each other/inextricably intertwined and form linked parts of a chain. For instance, medical sciences and electrical engineering seems completely irrelevant fields at the first glance; however, nowadays, doctors are dependent to on electrical equipment, mainly used for diagnostic purposes/diagnosis, which are designed and built by electrical engineers. Without these facilities, medical sciences were as capable as they were 2 centuries ago. Furthermore, engineers have to use the knowledge of doctors to develop these the equipment/these facilities. Therefore, they have no other choice but working together, and they need to know about each other’s fields to work together easier. In my personal opinion, it is impossible for two persons who does not have any information about each other’s capabilities to work together on a same issue. They need to be familiar with other one’s expertise rudimentary.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although people should concentrate on and become proficient in a specific field, they ought to have rudimentary information about other fields. Admittedly, various fields of science depend on each other and can be used together to cause a propulsion in science and make the life more convenient for people and develop the knowledge of human about the cosmos; however, scientists should have deep information about their field of study and try to expand the borders of science in that field as well.
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 90
- TPO10 - decreasing in otter population 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- TPO 33 85
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: One
...es in the past. For instance, Avicenna, One one of the most famous Persian scientists, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...ingly noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Techn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... fields to work together easier. In my personal opinion, it is impossible for two persons who d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'in short', 'no doubt', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217179902755 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.149108589951 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108589951378 0.0866891130778 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0583468395462 0.046263068375 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030794165316 0.0685040099705 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121555915721 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.030794165316 0.0351676179071 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.23383060658 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0275526742301 0.0309702414327 89% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0988654781199 0.0887237588012 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129659643436 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00810372771475 0.0139019557991 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3456.0 2387.08602151 145% => OK
No of words: 536.0 408.028673835 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.44776119403 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414179104478 0.338922669872 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.32276119403 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.253731343284 0.174417080927 145% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.199626865672 0.112833075102 177% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23383060658 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485074626866 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 57.6709636092 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.44 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.656000473 48.84282405 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.24 120.699889404 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.44 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.64 0.644075263715 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 53.716119403 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.55102040816 1.45489161554 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123066424048 0.300154397459 41% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131741955138 0.103427244359 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0912589307833 0.0752933317313 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.45985091642 0.497263757937 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137665115461 0.151897553556 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472606603987 0.114077575197 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324317429498 0.0781384742642 42% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412911439216 0.336927656856 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0459257172212 0.067059652881 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091076377904 0.210909579961 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00810291336509 0.0618886996521 13% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.91756272401 264% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.75985663082 362% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.