Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can damage our relationships with them. Which one do you agree with? Why?
Throughout the history, civilizations have been structured based on human relationships. While these communications swift during the centuries, they are counted as of the utmost important of each community, regardless of its size or belonged. The attitude toward this term is varied so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that they should keep their distance from their dears to remind them the importance of their relationships. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that long-distance is the pesticide of each relation. I am of the opinion that people should do their best in order to preserve their relationships.
First of all, rapid changes and complexity of today's world present new challenges and put new demands on the people. Admittedly, the growing segment of people become more involved in their routine activities every day, and they do not have enough time to spend with their friends. However, more people engaged in their life, they go away from their relations, and it becomes the matter of concerns for many sociologist that people become less and less in contact with each other. In a way that if they allocate little time to be with their friends their life has entirely changed. As a result, it will not be sensible if someone deliberately choose to be far away from their friend as they want to make them to understand or appreciate their affections or their feeling.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that people establish various kinds of relationships with each other, and most of them are not comparative. In fact, it is the acceptable principal of human science that says: "human is unpredictable." This statement approve that there is not a particular rule for the relationships, therefore we cannot generalize that being far away from other let them to value their relationships. For instance, I have some close friends; I have regular contact with some of them, whereas I prefer to visit others just face to face. This issue does not mean that they are different from me. I love all of them but I associate with them in varied ways. The vital matter is I do my best to enjoy from being with them, whether less or more.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that social communication plays a crucial role in this era of time, so people should try to spend enough time with others. Besides, people can manage their distance according to their relationships with other and keeping distance to change their mind is not a wise option.
- dinosaurs were endotherm 80
- Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 25 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sociologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sociologists'.
Suggestion: many sociologists
...d it becomes the matter of concerns for many sociologist that people become less and less in con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...not be sensible if someone deliberately choose to be far away from their friend as the...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'while', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.191666666667 0.229887763892 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.164583333333 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0895833333333 0.0866891130778 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0458333333333 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.1 0.0685040099705 146% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.154166666667 0.118717715034 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0333333333333 0.0351676179071 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86361655096 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03125 0.0309702414327 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.08125 0.0887237588012 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0145833333333 0.0209618222197 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00625 0.0139019557991 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2565.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 433.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92378752887 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314087759815 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.226327944573 0.251872472559 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15935334873 0.174417080927 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115473441109 0.112833075102 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86361655096 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519630484988 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.2801718186 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0555555556 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8452795091 48.84282405 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 120.699889404 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0555555556 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.644075263715 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.6883500128 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.22147651007 1.45489161554 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316253975501 0.300154397459 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111188601864 0.103427244359 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.083626411884 0.0752933317313 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517830240568 0.497263757937 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140374872598 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123145386899 0.114077575197 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625761170406 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347649477604 0.336927656856 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.034473880282 0.067059652881 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226484199433 0.210909579961 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224747034851 0.0618886996521 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.