Although, cars are integral part of our daily lives; I believe that people will refrain from the use of cars in near future. The reason that can be explained behind this crucial move is that; cars are polluting the air. There will be availability of efficient public transportation system in our cities and villages; also, people are becoming health conscious so will avoid the usage of cars.
First of all, the foremost reason for abandoning the cars in future is contributed to the pollution caused by these cars. The cars emit gases that are very harmful not only to human beings but also to the earth. The pollution is a significant contributing factor in developing dreadful health problems in people, such as, difficulty in breathing, allergies and asthma. The pollutants such as carbon dioxide, mono oxide and methane etc. are also responsible for global warming which has some serious effects on our weather patterns. In order to survive more and more people should be encouraged to avoid use of cars.
Furthermore, to combat this harmful effect on human health and on our mother earth, government is striving hard to improve public transportation system. They are also placing heavy taxes on gasoline and on new cars. For example, our government has started working on metro rail project to encourage people to use public transport than private cars. We do have a good bus service which we can use in our current situation.
Additionally, getting rid of car is important for your health. People also use their cars to shop around the corner or even in their own neighborhood. By limiting use of cars will encourage people to walk or ride a bike. This way, they will stay fit as fiddle. For instance, my parents insists me and my brother to use our bike to get something from store than riding a car for such short distances. Because of this we have developed a liking for bike rides and are able to keep us healthy. We do not need to spend our lot of time in performing other forms of exercise.
To wrap it up, I will suggest all of my friends to do their part in saving not only our beautiful mother nature, but also themselves by avoiding the frequent use of cars. They should walk or use bike which are cheaper mode of travel too.
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 60
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 73
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lty in breathing, allergies and asthma. The pollutants such as carbon dioxide, mono...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70886075949 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55746830431 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539240506329 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7105384574 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5454545455 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142941619029 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464774381052 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03214649462 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874681187703 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342293577349 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.