These years have seemed rapidly changes in the way of acquiring information. Many people argue that knowledge in the science field, business information as well as academic one should be publicized, whereas others suppose that it would be better to limit the access to the information. I believe that it all depends.
On the one hand, it is explanatory why some people prefer particular information should be open to the public. Provided that everyone is allowed to hold scientific techniques, the whole community would be benefited at large, since essential and inexpensive goods would be manufactured on a substantial scale. Decades ago, for instance, it was only a few numbers of wealthy people who was able to search on the Internet. Once the method was widely unveiled, the probability of searching the information from Internet was accessible to the poor.
On the other hand, the access of specialized information may be classified and should not be shared freely in business world. One reason is that some kinds of knowledge are extremely important to such an extent that the inappropriate use of these techniques would probably be a root of some global disasters. For example, in scientific world, some information may be relevant to military secrets, like the high resolution images from satellites. It is inaccessible and unsafe for normal people to get those clear images which may cause irreversible solution. Secondly, many researchers, as well as some corporations, devoted their entire life and large period to searching in their chosen field, their achievements should be provided sufficient rewards such as the patent or copyright to their goals, rather than leaking all those commercial confident documents out to all the public.
In conclusion, the admission to access essential information should be open to the whole community, however, vital and secret one should be narrowly provided.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely. 73
- Some people think the governments should act to decide how people live in order to make a healthier life Others think individual should decide their own lifestyle What do you concern about Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people say that government should pay for the health care but other people say that it is not the governments' responsibility. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people say that government should pay for the health care but other people say that it is not the governments' responsibility. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ecades ago, for instance, it was only a few number of wealthy people who was able to searc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ns, devoted their entire life and large period of time to searching in their chosen field, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...od of time to searching in their chosen field, their achievements should be provided ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 892, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...onfident documents out to all the public.. In conclusion, the admission to acce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2908496732 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96583166427 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5088441586 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270441538346 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985164930546 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724352687628 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151271083171 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050019026 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.