Deaths in Someland 1990 and medical research funding in Someland
The presented bar chart illustrates the number of people died of AIDS, leprosy, tropical diseases, diarrhoea, malaria and TB in Someland 1990. Meanwhile, the other shows the amount of money spent on medical research in Someland at the same time.
It can be seen clearly that the highest funding was paid out for AIDS while the number of deaths of TB was the most.
In Someland 1990, the people died of TB reached over 1.5 millions, which approximately fourth as high as that of diarrhoea and seventh as high as deaths for leprosy. In addition, the number of victims who could not recover from malaria, tropical diseases and AIDS were around 0.5 millions.
Althought most of the people died of TB, the research’s expenditure for TB were lowest, just 25 millions in 1990; whereas that of for AIDS received over 150 millions. Research funding in leprosy and tropical diseases stayed at the second with approximately 100 millions. In comparison with the budget used to medical research in malaria, at 50 millions, the budget of medical research in diarrhoea were more than 10 millions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | cupinsiuway | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | mytruc | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Rajan wahla | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | akashdhingra | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | hunanmail | 73 | view |
- Levels of unemloyment in 3 countries 79
- The table below provide informationon rental charges and salaries in three areas of London 56
- Task 2 As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 54
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- : Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ond with approximately 100 millions. In comparison with the budget used to medical researc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9781420765 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68666913627 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5489725821 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29905054436 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126273742589 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733566315668 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171578806751 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076055877296 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.