: Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of technology dragged on the large number of digital communication methods such as computers, mobile phones were produced. People often use those to connect with others. However, I believe that the growth use of digital communication has had a negative effect on ability to read and write of young people.
The primary reason is starting at its convenience and speed. For example, people use the informal language in communication via computers and moblie phones. They will use “u” instead of “you”, “HPB” replaced to “happy birth day”. Besides, mobile operators have capped the length of text messages to 160 characters. On the contrary, writing skills’s requirement is making full sentences with formal language. Children will can not discribe a beatiful scenery or express their fellings on papers. Spending too much time on digital communication methods will affect on the lacking of ability to write.
Another negative effect of the increasing of computers and mobile phones for communication were that capping the reading skills. Of phones and computers, there are automatic spell-check tools when you type a message. If this process are repeated, the user will be depend on it. Their spelling, grammar and lexical range may gradually erode. In addition, there are many vary information in the Internet which people use digital communication methods can read. They will not know how to select it to read. The disorder of information is one of disavantages caused by the increasing use of electronic devices. It also affect on our reading skills.
To sum up, we can not negate advantages which electronic devices gave; however, people should have controlled the time spending on it. If not, the our ability to read and write will be seriously affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-18 | tramhuynh123 | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- Task 2 As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 54
- Deaths in Someland 1990 and medical research funding in Someland 73
- sfasfas 11
- Comparison of car theft 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e on digital communication methods will affect on the lacking of ability to write. Anoth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...sing use of electronic devices. It also affect on our reading skills. To sum up, we ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...sing use of electronic devices. It also affect on our reading skills. To sum up, we can...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...rolled the time spending on it. If not, the our ability to read and write will be serio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37762237762 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02266205384 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58041958042 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0283741114 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370616723317 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960878030707 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093099774237 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216826305838 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715737252341 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.