The author of the topic states that students should be required to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Due to the controversial and complex nature of the topic, there is not a general arguement on this issue. I, however, to a great extent, agree with the statement. In the ensuing paragraphs, convincing resons will be delineated.
For one thing, schools can ensure the qulity of their teaching more easily if students take the same curriculum. As we all know, to offer a new course, schools and teacher would have to spend a lot of money and time working with the teaching materails and teaching methods, which may not necessarily ensure the quality. On the contrary, if all the students take the same curriculum, then teachers could share their experience and skills, which makes the teaching more professional, scientific and efficient.
For another thing, students will be equiped with the most important and foundamental knowledge if they are required to take the same curriculum that is the basis for all fields of study. Let us boldly image that if a school does not require its students to take mathematics class, then most of them will skip it for its difficulty, resulting in their unqualification in their further study in fields like physics and chemistry. The kind of case may happen very often since most of the students are not mature enough to consider what they really need to learn to pursue their future study and tend to choose the courses that are easy for them.
However, what I have alluded to above dose not draw the whole picture. Due to the different characteristics of the students, requring them to take the same curriculum may even frustrate them. For example, someone may lose his interest in study if he is required to take the courses that he is not good at. In these cases, our education methods should be more flexible, like making differnent requirements for one course: a student can choose to be just provided with a "pass or not pass" score for the courses that he is not good at and a letter socre for the courses he likes.
In conclusion, requiring students to take the same national curriculum will not only equip students with basic knowledge that they need in further study but also ensure the qulity of the teaching process. And the disadvantages brought by this recommendation can be solved by a flexible examination requirement.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 54
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heati 83
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 79
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- 49) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ent can choose to be just provided with a 'pass or not pass' score for ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, so, then, another thing, for example, in conclusion, kind of, for another thing, for one thing, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90731707317 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73588965549 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49512195122 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6657016638 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 5.21951772744 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283097725394 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963352412551 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891016479782 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166699315096 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479143707343 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.