As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Universally acknowledged, the modern society is a era of development of technology. And it is without any exaggeration that the increasingly advanced technology and aritificial intelligence greatly influence human'a life in many aspects. Thus, some people may argue that with more and more reliance on technology to haddle with problems, man will definitely lose the ability of self-thinking. It may sounds reasonable at first glance by virture of the fact that scientific product do change our lives. However from my point of view, the development of technology may help human beings a lot, but will impossibly deteriorate the their thinking ability.
Fisrtly, I have to admit that the advanced technical equipments have free human beings from the daily trials and give them more opportunities to do some more meaningful things. In other words, the inventions in support of work and family life increase the productivity and save many difficult problems. For example, the washing machine liberate housewife from the endless dishes and plates, giving them more time to culticate their own interests. Another example may extends to the working field. It is easy to understand that the meal APP with the big data cauculation in a smartphone is a brilliant invention that solves the problem of those crazy businessmen's lunch problem. Thanks to the greatly times of technology, people's life and work have never been more convenient and comfortable.
It may well first to premise that technology has made an impressive impact on human's life. However, I don't wish to maintain that the progress of techonology will weaken the thinking ability of humans. In the contrast, it is the steadily advance of science and technology that will better arouse the evoke the human's mind. To better understand this claim, we should get knowledge of what promotes mankind thinking and its relationship with technology in the human history. Is technology determine how people think? Hardly. Is human themself enlightenment themselves unconciously and develop science? Possibility. Looking back to the history, the invention of science always accompany with the philosophical thinking.Many examples can exemplify my argument. With 3D printing, artificial intelligence applicants showing up in the field of clinical medical research, many moral problems thereby arise. The boundary of technology and human moral ethics should be taken into consideration by humans and thus technology will be more appropriately to serve the society. In conclusion, relationship of technology applicance and mankind is a mutual process, during which not only technology benefit the humans, but also we thinking ability is provoked and should be put in priority to lead this development.
In addition, while some people assume that human thinking will be replaced by the technology and the others do not. From where I stand, this two factors do not constitute the irreconcilable diotomy. To better understand their relationship, we should revisit the value of techonology under the dominance of human beings, which, is tool to solve problems. Thus, it can be undoubtly combined with the value of human beings when confronting dilemma, which, is the critical thinking. By stating the above assumption, I would like to emphasize that technology to human thinking ability is ropes to our horse. Therefore, rather than worry about whether techonology will deterioate our thinking ability, it is better to explore how to take our thinking advantage to utilize the technology, in order to promote a better society.
To summarize, while I admit that the advanced techonology benefits humans in dealing with problems especially in the houselife and working field, the consequence of it deteriorate people's self-thinking ability should be considered more cauciously. Additionally, under the abosulote control of human's thinking , the marriage of techonology and mankind's mind will promote them a better performance and make greater contribution to the society.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 33
- University should require every student to take a variety of cources outside the student's field of study. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.Write a r 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lly acknowledged, the modern society is a era of development of technology. And i...
^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...scientific product do change our lives. However from my point of view, the development ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 624, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
... a lot, but will impossibly deteriorate the their thinking ability. Fisrtly, I have t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nology has made an impressive impact on humans life. However, I dont wish to maintain ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ssive impact on humans life. However, I dont wish to maintain that the progress of t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 297, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and technology that will better arouse the evoke the humans mind. To better understand t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 516, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'Hardly' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... technology determine how people think? Hardly. Is human themself enlightenment themse...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 717, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Many
...company with the philosophical thinking.Many examples can exemplify my argument. Wit...
^^^^
Line 6, column 765, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mples can exemplify my argument. With 3D printing, artificial intelligence applic...
^^
Line 6, column 916, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... problems thereby arise. The boundary of technology and human moral ethics should...
^^
Line 8, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tool to solve problems. Thus, it can be undoubtly combined with the value of hum...
^^
Line 8, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy will deterioate our thinking ability, it is better to explore how to take our ...
^^
Line 10, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mote a better society. To summarize, while I admit that the advanced techonol...
^^
Line 10, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the abosulote control of humans thinking , the marriage of techonology and mankind...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3400.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 622.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46623794212 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99398916966 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04600343205 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1085.4 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7885095924 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.24137931 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4482758621 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.51724137931 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273688176798 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742109188668 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521850940651 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16263951918 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311687092415 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.