The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in fiveEuropean countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables above represent the figures about the revenue of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five different European countries in 1999 and five years after that. Broadly speaking, the sales from coffee and bananas increase considerably through the period.
As can be seen from the given numbers, there was a significant growth in the revenue from selling coffee over 5 countries in 1999 compare to 2004. In the UK, the sales in 2004 exceed approximately ten times than that in five years before that made it become the first ranking. Additional, that was also a rise in Switzerland taking up double than early time. We also noticed that the slightly increase in the other countries.
Likewise, the sales from bananas in Switzerland had the highest ranking with leap dramatically from 15 million to 47 million. The next one is UK which only increased 4.5 million on 5 years. On the contrast, there were steadily declines in Sweden and Denmark, which the former taking up 1 million and the later occupying 0.9 million in 2004.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in fiveEuropean countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the graph below show radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 61
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch, two cities in New Zealand, and London and Edinburgh, two cities in United Kingdom.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 67
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, broadly speaking
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73128820564 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7033486547 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148652327887 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576701823174 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528895696426 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108004323154 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696542825964 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.