Line graph
The line graph illustrates the visitor spend every year from 1996 to 2014 by tourist in 5 countries including Australia, USA, UK ,Japan and China. Units are measured in NZ$.
Generally, during this period, annual expenditure spend increased in all 5 countries. Among them, Australian spending was by far the highest number as opposed to the lowest in China.
In 1996, Chinese spent the least money visiting with New Zealand with approximately 50 NZ$ per visitor whereas the Australian afforded 1050 NZ$ that is 21 times larger than Chinese. The other 3 countries had the spending above 400NZ$ including around 450NZ$ in UK and Japan, 750NZ$ in USA
In the next period, the expenditure fluctuated among countries. In 2004, total money afforded by Chinese exceeded that of the UK. However, until 2014, China turned back to the country spending less travelling New Zealand with only 400NZ$ per visitor and Australia was the most generous spender who pay up to 2000NZ$ annually for for New Zealand visits.
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 83
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings, but many of them lead unhappy lives. Do you agree? 84
- Line graph 11
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Every minute every day, people suffer and lives are lost needlessly because of a lack of safe water and sanitation, the population is being viewed as the real problem and controlling birthrates should totally address the problem. To what extent do you agr 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...5 countries including Australia, USA, UK ,Japan and China. Units are measured in N...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun travelling is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ina turned back to the country spending less travelling New Zealand with only 400NZ$...
^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
... spender who pay up to 2000NZ$ annually for for New Zealand visits.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06626506024 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55887986499 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1852072442 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0663466839934 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030494465625 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806807724076 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562321121611 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973968752799 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.