In this competitive world sharing information freely continues to be a controversial topic. While there are persuasive arguments in favour of the free flow of information, I would argue that it is better to keep critical information secret.
On the one hand, those who enthusiastic about the outbreak of knowledge would claim that in this occasion scientists can push back the frontier of knowledge. Therefore, they have the opportunity to flourish their creativity and, in turn, all countries will be able to boost the pace of their research process. Furthermore, particular information should be opened to the public. For example, a vast majority of businessmen would have achieved success if wealthy and renown traders had shared the details of their work. Finally, some people would assume that by the free share of scientific data has the potential to revolutionise the academic society. As a result, scientific development and the knowledge of academic society would have risen, as it can be seen in Green Lab (for instance), where the pace of success inevitably continues to grow.
On the other hand, it is universally accepted that revelation of extremely arcane information leads to some irreversible dire consequences. First and foremost, if scientific research, nuclear weapons and tests, for instance, is published without proper authorization the incidence of plagiarism will raise. Thus, the inappropriate use of these techniques could cause some global disasters. Secondly, some trade secrets are of paramount importance for a company. Therefore, if they broadcast the infrastructures of their business they will face some threats and, in turn, they will go bankrupt. Lastly, as a result of existing different ways for an academic research, sharing any method can bring about some indeterminacies.
By and large, notwithstanding the fact that innovation flourishes where individuals find it easy to release information, I am of the opinion that some details are highly critical and vulnerable to be shared.
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods, reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 82
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44761904762 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15212038758 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8545131977 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243713876594 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828011860134 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534006593223 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135331516107 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511366613639 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.