The government should invest money in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree
People have different views about whether government budgets should only be spent on providing the knowledge of science subjects to help their country develop. While I accept that countries could reap many benefits from this policy, I would argue that it is better not to neglect other subjects.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it can be argued that putting an emphasis on teaching science-related subjects significantly contributes to the well-being of a country. Perhaps the first reason is that many of the scientific breakthroughs heavily depend on the knowledge of mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In the field of medicine, for example, it is impossible for scientists to carry out research and successfully invent new drugs without considerable in-depth knowledge of chemistry. The teaching quality of these subjects should, therefore, be continuously improved so that we could have great scientists in the future. The other major reason is that studying science subjects requires learners to have sensible thinking and problem-solving skills, which is likely to boost their imagination and creativity. Such capabilities are of paramount importance to coming up with technological innovations, and these advancements could help a country to gain a competitive edge over other countries.
On the other hand, I am of opinion that the government should not underestimate the benefits that other subjects bring to the development of the country. Firstly, in the era of globalisation, international trade plays a pivotal role in the economy of any countries and those trade activities could not be taken place if language barriers still exist. This means that common and universal languages should be encouraged to be taught in schools so that school leavers and graduates could do business with people from abroad. Secondly, subjects such as geography or biology equip students with knowledge of natural habitats and species, which could help them to be aware of the importance of environmentally sustainable development. It becomes clear that the growth of a country would stop and even decline if its wildlife species became extinct and natural resources were exhausted.
In conclusion, although I acknowledge that the government allocating resources to teaching science subjects helps a country progress, I believe that it is also necessary for other subjects to be taught.
- Now big cities have many problems. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage city residents to move to small cities and towns? 79
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do u agree or disagree 88
- The government should invest money in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems. The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47311827957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11158904048 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.536771058 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232989854092 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845799132231 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762241399105 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174058576085 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586125553205 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.