The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday.
This table compares the different goods sold by a coffee shop which is located in an office building during a typical weekday in correlation with the time in the day.
Firstly, coffee sales were maximum(265) in the morning from 7:30 to 10:30, decreased steadily after 10:30 to reach less than 150 by 5:30, then rose to 200 in the evening. In addition, Tea sales showed similar pattern to coffee, they stood at 110 in the morning, less than half the coffee sales in the same period and fell to 35 between 2:30 and 5:30. However, they almost doubled in the evening between 5:30 and 8:30.
On the other hand, pastries sales fluctuated throughout the day with the peak in the morning 7:30 - 10:30 of about 275 and the bottom in the evening 5:30 - 8:30 of about 80. Moreover, sandwiches sales in the period of 7:30 - 10:30 and 8:30 - 5:30 were similar, 50 and 40, respectively. Sandwiches sales were the highest between 10:30 and 2:30 (200 sandwiches), almost two times the sales in the evening.
To conclude, it can be clearly seen that different goods experienced different patterns of sales throughout the day.
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 76
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78125 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43492993707 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9201463605 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155037066052 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872140291855 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107512752114 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1319203095 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130654635143 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.