the chart below shows the most popular films by genre for men and women and general ticket sales for different types of film in the USA in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
the bar chart gives the information about which types of films were watched the most for men and women. While the pie chart illustrates the proportion of general ticket sales for various of types of films. Both diagrams refer to the USA in 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the bar chart is that the most popular movie is actions for men and romantic comedies for women. In pie chart, actions was the highest ticket sales.
Twice as many men said that they liked actions than comedies, at 40% and 20% in turn. In terms of actions, the number of men who liked to watch was much higher than for women, at 25 %. In contrast, women said that they spent on watching romantic comedies was six times as popular as that of men. Both comedies and western had the same proportion of men and women who liked, at 20% and 10% respectively. Regarding thriller and sci-fic, men said they liked watching was higher than women, at 15% and 10%, respectively for men, at 10% and 5% respectively for women
Action had almost half proportion of general ticket sales, with 49%, making it considerably more popular than comedies, at 24%. This was followed by romantic comedies with 12 %. And thriller came next at 10%, just ahead of other's ticket sales, at 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-22 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-05-16 | elirya | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not writing a report 87
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar chart gives the information about w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61990950226 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31891902166 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.5536689944 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271709329311 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113160707195 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919283489987 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199886183234 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120305997489 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.