The line graph below show the percentage of tourist to England who vistited 4 different attractions in Brigton
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors who traveled to EngLand to explore four different attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010
As can be seen that, the amount of people who traveled to the Pier and the pavilion increased steadily throughout the period. By contrast, there were a significant fall in the percentage of people visiting other attractions in the same time
The number of visitors to Pier fluctuated consistently, although it always remained above 10% in the first decade, Throughout the remainder of the period, the figure improved significantly from 10% in 1990 to over 20% in 2010. Over the same period, the proportion of traveller to the Pavilion rose sharply before reaching the highest point at approximately 50% by the year 1995. However, this percentage fell steadily to just over 30% in 2010
From 19080 to 1985, the number of people visiting the Art gallery increased significantly to about 38% but this fell steadily to just below 10% in 2010. The figure for the Festival decreased slightly from 30% in 1980 to about 25% during the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-23 | hannahnguyen186 | 61 | view |
- whether or not someone achieve their aim is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- The line graph below show the percentage of tourist to England who vistited 4 different attractions in Brigton 61
- whether or not someone achieves their aim is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02209944751 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79467371151 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.1648456019 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.8 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131254451046 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632923842763 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079934467688 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104240548299 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105403864928 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.