tpo integrated 49
The lecture and the reading both discuss the migration of humpback whales. The reading states that the humpbacks navigate using stars to help them to migrate. The lecture refutes this by saying that the idea of using stars to navigate is fascinating, however, the theories provided by the reading are not convincing.
First of all, the reading claims that the humpbacks are very intelligent, which provides them the opportunity to use the stars to navigate on there way of migration. However, the lecture argues that intelligent is not the main reason that they can navigate by using stars. Moreover the professor says that ducks also migrate but they are not as intelligent as humpbacks.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that humpback usually migrate in straight lines, which means that they use outside sign to navigate. In case of humpback they use the stars as a sign to help them migrate. That is why they move in straight lines. The lecture counters this point by stating that the reason that humpback migrate in straight is that they use the magnetic field to migrate. According to the professor, the humpbacks have a biomagnified in their brains that leads them to move in straight line according to the magnetic field.
Lastly, the reading argues that humpbacks have unusual behavior called spy hoping. They usually come out of the water to look at the stars, which means that they use the stars as a mean to navigate during migration. The lecture refutes this point by stating that spy hopping is a poor speculation. Furthermore, the professor says that sharks doing the spy hopping behavior even they are not migrate. According to the professor, sharks using spy hopping to hunt other animals and they usually do that behavior in the morning while there are no stars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- some students prefer classes with open discussion with almost no lecture. other think that it is better for student to learn with no discussion only lecture 60
- why people attend college and university? 60
- tpo integrated 13 73
- All university students should required to talk history courses not matter what is their field . 70
- TPO INTEGRATED 34 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...te using stars to help them to migrate. The lecture refutes this by saying that the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by the reading are not convincing. First of all, the reading claims that th...
^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... that they can navigate by using stars. Moreover the professor says that ducks also migr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not as intelligent as humpbacks. In addition, the reading makes the argum...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... according to the magnetic field. Lastly, the reading argues that humpback...
^^^
Line 10, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
... spy hopping behavior even they are not migrate. According to the professor, sharks usi...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the morning while there are no stars.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96699669967 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50480047556 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39603960396 0.540411800872 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5573180088 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0625 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334586355502 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137776360704 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531805511676 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226345463263 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368867843968 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.