tpo18
Both the reading and lecture are about Torreya taxifoha which is a type of evergreen tree and native of Florida. Unfortunately, it has started to decline from 1950. The reading provides three approaches for improving this condition and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and find all arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that reestablishing this species in the environment that it could have survived for thousands years. This ambient has a lot of suitable microclimates which help Torreya taxifoha to stay cool. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that such a great environment was influenced by large cities. The lecturer elaborates on this by mentioning that nowadays, global warming have negative impacts on these trees and since wetlands have drained, there is no original microclimate in northern part of Florida.
Secondly, the reading suggests that with relocating Torreya taxifoha to the furthest areas can be noticed as assisted migration and it is one of the most effective ways for rescuing of Torreya taxifoha species; in the contrast, the professor tenders an example from this procedure to stress some its disadvantages. The lecture contends, a few years ago, people attempted to relocate Locus tree species then extremist spreading of these trees could kill other types of plants; as a result, this approach has unexpected consequences.
Finally, the reading passage states that researchers can maintain Torreya taxifoha trees in a research center. With this method they will not only be able to assist Torreya taxifoha for surviving, but also they can pursue their researches on this type of tree. This argument is rebutted by the professor again. She claims that Torreya species requires large places to reproduce seeds which are resistance genetically; however, since the research centers does not support large rooms; subsequently, Torreya taxifoha trees will not be rigid and resistance in front of disease and their population will continue to its reduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | khatuntajkera | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | Nasirti | 70 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | bahar_93 | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-12 | sarkar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | supergirl20 | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree?playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 84
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 85
- which one is better?Participating in the class and sharing idea or sitting and listening to the teacher and taking note? 76
- do you agree or disagree?it is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than by doing exercise. 90
- tpo20 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3556231003 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80942497518 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.604413178 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372411307384 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116555918429 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089926734708 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223158219767 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485603789592 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.