do you agree or disagree? children should play in outside with their friend than staying at home and playing with computers or cell-phones.
The question is whether students should play with their friends in outside to develop or working and playing with technologies such as computer, tablet and self-phone and so on. Everyone with regard to his perspective can maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that since nowadays the technology has kept marching forward; hence, the young should spend much time on it while others have a conviction that these types of devices can provide some irrecoverable damages in related to children's future. I am unanimous with the latter group; so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, recent researches have shown that natural plays particularly those are done by friends will cause the brain’s performance to optimize. When the young play with each other, as a matter a fact, they display some creative behaviors. For instance, children have a variety of fantasies in their dream; therefore, they would like to show those mentioned dreams during play. This activity assists the young boost their power mind and meanwhile during school, the young will choose the best and fast approach to do their research papers. Take my own experience. When I was a kid, I and my friends were in the dream of flight. We were always attempting to make some tools for achieving this goal. Honestly, we could never succeed; however, our effort was appreciable and also that way helped us to broaden the capacity of our brain.
In addition, the movement, jumping and running play a crucial role in humans' health. Today's, the overwhelming majority of children have the obesity troubles because they prefer to lie down in front of TV to watch their favorite programs or sit down on the chair for a long time and play with their computers or tablets. Unfortunately, with passing time, the aforementioned problem can get worse. When children grow up in this way, their soul will be tried and the sense of torpid or numb feeling will overcome them. For preventing of depression or suicide thoughts in the future, parents should encourage their beasts to limit technology-based activities or at least they can plan an adequate program for playing with commuters. Playing in outside will lead the young to maintain their body in fitness mode; consequently, their self-confidence will increase.
Moreover, one should not forget that playing with friends have a striking role in improving the relationships with others. A kid, who stays at home, will not have a chance to make new friends for himself. It goes without saying that the poor kid can suffer from social problems in the future in association with society. Yet, a child who spends enough time with their friends has high quality of interpersonal skills.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I believe that playing in outside of home with other kids can form the children's personality through boosting confidence in communication with others and also their brain has an opportunity to grow in the productive way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-11 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? parents today are more involved in their children’s' education than were parents in the past . 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 90
- tpo17 83
- Tpo39 3
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, honestly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, at least, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07936507937 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72591898096 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3463245088 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37422824549 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10707030925 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822939448833 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227806482726 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403612408762 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.