Many people believe that international sporting events can contribute to world peace while others argue otherwise. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is often argued that, make use of sports events like football, cricket, athletics and so on would create more peace in worldwide. Whereas, others object to this opinion and give some other options. However, In my perceptive, both arguments have positive reassurance to the globe in many ways.
Firstly, some believe that, conducting such events would exaggerate the interconnection between the nations. Peoples who went to attend sports events would make the nations tourism development. By the virtue of that peoples would meet new inhabitants and wide range of relationship will grow. Secondly, various kinds of events facilitate civilization acknowledgement to different nationalities too. For example, participants and viewers of these events would get the chance to know the liberal and local celebrations and their importance to the society. Although, it is difficult to understand, that would enhance the visitor's perceptions and may leads to the wide range of capability to get peace in an innate and visiting country too.
On the other hand, the other hand, some reckon that, apart from the sports events, people could generate peace in the whole nations by doing recreational and financial support to the under developed countries. For instance, United Nation have had many projects for the development of nations, including illiteracy, unemployment, and malnutrition eradication program so on. In addition to the national growth such factors might influence the peace and worship of the society.
In conclusion, I believe, all the controversy regarding the world peace either associated with the sports program or other ways have to subside often. There is no negative impact on to the nations regarding such events.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity? 73
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 82
- The bar graph below represents the data about the clubs joined by the people of two different age groups at a leisure center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The table below shows the production of carbon d Nkioxide in five different countries in 2006 67
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... to attend sports events would make the nations tourism development. By the virtue of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand, the other hand, some reckon that, apart from the sports events, people cou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...under developed countries. For instance, United Nation have had many projects for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93308079721 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9858187341 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213177041776 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682551746007 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473726049979 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128617741123 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050736613503 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.