Tpo 7
Both the reading and lecture are about certification of woods for protecting and behaving friendly with the environment. The reading provides three reasons that American companies fail to be prosperous with the method. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that certification allows companies to advertise their products for more selling; however, consumers do not usually rely on the advertisement; hence they will not pay attention to new and improved certification label. This point is challenged by the lecturer. The professor points out that people in the United State have ability of distinguish an ordinary advertisement- related to an ordinary company- and an advertisement related to international agency with the global reputation; consequently, they will show a big passion toward certificated woods.
Secondly, the article contends that certification requires much more money; subsequently, wood companies will increase the woods' price and people can suffer from this condition, so buying low price and certificated wood will be in priority; in the contrast, the lecturer offers that based on a done research, consumers notice to other factors especially when the difference of price of two products is less than 5 percentage particularly when they be sure that a product can protect from environment.
. Finally, the reading passage states that since the most of wood companies in the United State sell their products inside of country, so they will not be able to keep up with international business; therefore certification issue will not be effect. This argument is rebutted by the professor again. He claims that American companies would like to do the foreign competition to attract foreign consumers. When they would appeal inside consumers, gradually they will be able to capture foreign clients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-28 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 75 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | shayanhgh | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | NGN | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | ehsanghoflsaz | 3 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | cluelessme | 70 | view |
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 65
- do you agree or disagree? it is easier to become educated today than it was in the past. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 'It is impossible to be completely honest with friends. 86
- Tpo17 69
- do you agree or disagree?advertising can tell you a lot about a country 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...roduct can protect from environment. . Finally, the reading passage states tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47315436242 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02710136796 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.721730893 49.2860985944 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.272727273 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.