tpo35
Both the reading and lecture are about an ancient handwritten manuscript which has been written on the vellum and also it was obtained by Voynich. This book includes a complex unreadable code and content. The reading provides three reasons for the origin of this book and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that the mentioned manuscript is a valuable scientific or magical book because its code is unknown. It may have been for Anthony Ascham who was a physician in 16th century. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that this person was an ordinary physician and he used other original ideas as his own work. For instance the herbal which is a well-known plant and it has been alluded in this book, does not seem be idea of Ascham and even these complex detailed codes fail to consider as his book.
Secondly, the article contends that there was a man who was called Edward Kelley. his work was that he was making fake books and then he was selling them to wealthy people; in the contrast the professor poses that people in the 16th century did not have enough knowledge for discerning a fake or original book; hence, Kelly did not need to spend much time for writing such complicated codes.
Finally, the reading passage offers that Voynich could have written this book. Since he was an old book seller; consequently his knowledge allowed him to write this fake book for appealing people and obtaining money. This argument is rebutted by the professor again. He claims that based on a research, it was discovered that the ink and vellum's date of this manuscript returns to 400 years ago and as we all now Voynich was living in 1912; therefore this offer is disproved by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-08 | incoco | 90 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | rosray | 3 | view |
| 2020-02-09 | supergirl20 | view | |
| 2020-02-08 | farzaddanaeii | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | farzaddanaeii | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 85
- which one is better?Participating in the class and sharing idea or sitting and listening to the teacher and taking note? 76
- do you agree or disagree?advertising can tell you a lot about a country. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: His
...was a man who was called Edward Kelley. his work was that he was making fake books ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73831775701 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3829922759 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1041177117 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.