Do you agree or disagree? The food we eat today is much healthier than past.
The question is whether nowadays food are much healthier compared with past or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue; however, I am inclined to declare that in the past, people had a chance to consume the most nutrition food. I feel this way for some reasons, which I explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, in the past, humans applied the best and most healthy ingredients in cooking food. Nobody could overlook this fact that food plays a pivotal role in people's life. If human beings have an opportunity to eat safe things, they will be able to manage their work, study and social life and list goes on. Since in the past, people were self-sufficient, so they were attempting to produce their needed materials by themselves like planting the vegetables and cooking diverse kinds of dishes and so on. Besides, previous generation was living in bigger houses including yard or garden unlike us who are living in a small apartment, so as you observe, there was an ideal condition for them. In these days and ages, our generation is wrestling with economic crises and the members of family even women have to work for a long time; consequently, there is no enough time for cooking at home. On the other hand, improving the business world has caused to create numerous profitable businesses such as a variety of food companies, the restaurants, the homemade food stores and you name it. All of these provide the food with normal cost for their clients. One should not forget that food which is being cooked in the out by these types of stores includes a lot of salt, cheap and harmful oils and sugar and so on. So it is obvious that we do not consume the healthy foods.
The second reason for my claim lies in the reality of technology. The role of technology in optimizing the world is an undeniable fact; however, sometimes it can act in a reverse route. For instance, farmers usually use different pesticides for protecting of their products. Unfortunately, based on a done research in a well-known institution, these types of pesticides have increased cancer among people in recent years. Moreover, researchers could discover a kind of substance which can make people addict to eating. This substance is one of the most main ingredients in food industrial. It can reduce your blood sugar and your body is always hungry and ready for eating different kinds of fast foods, ice creams and pasta and this list seems endless. One should notice that people used to eat organic fruits without any chemical pesticides, and homemade pasta with the best natural oil; subsequently, in such a great circumstance, no one could become ill.
As I have illustrated, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly disagree that people feed healthy foods today's. The inncremaent fast foods with oily and salty food and not to have enough time for preparing homemade meals have reduced the quality of food compared with the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for instance, i feel, kind of, such as, to begin with, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83976833977 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59103638277 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561776061776 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4152996401 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.954545455 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168161897429 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500640180198 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532295406922 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107308460102 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041796526656 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.