Chaco Structures
The article states that archaelogists have been trying to determine the usage of a great bulding in New Mexico and explains three competing theory about that. The Professor explains that non of the theories is convincing and refutes each of the mentioned theories in the article.
The first theory state that the Chaco structures were purely residential. The professor refutes this point. He states that the outside of bulding is like apartment but inside of it is not. The professor says that the residential bulding need many fire places but in Chaco there are only few fire places. Considering the size of houses which have 10 fire places, they can not be sufficent fot housing hundredes of people.
The second theory claims that chaco structures were used to store food. However, the proffesor explians that this theory is not supported by evidence. He says that according to excavation finding there is no remarkable evidence about crops such as grain maize to support this theory.
The third theory claims that houses were used as ceremonial centeres. The professors says that this theory isn't supported too. He explains that larg quantity of trash of materials are related to bulding activitis and the evidneces regarded to meals are the wastes of cosntruction workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-15 | margarita1608 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the mentioned theories in the article. The first theory state that the Chaco struc...
^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aco structures were purely residential. The professor refutes this point. He states...
^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'say'.
Suggestion: say
... as ceremonial centeres. The professors says that this theory isnt supported too. He...
^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...s. The professors says that this theory isnt supported too. He explains that larg qu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10476190476 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57003489569 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9108265438 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4615384615 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147065820689 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649043615358 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132349488688 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883208377357 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088678188004 0.0443174109184 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.