It is important to keep your old friends than is to make new friends.
Human is a social animal. He needs to interact with other human beings to sustain in the long run. Making friends is a crucial part of our social behaviour and demonstrates our social skills. Friends change according to time but it is important to value our old friend even though we make new friends.
One of the most important advantages of keeping old friends is that they know you inside out. Since you have spent a lot of time together, they are highly aware of your behaviour and will thus adapt accordingly. They will try to suit you better as compared to the new friends. This will give rise to a better understanding between the two.
Also, they are more dependable because they are trustworthy. Hence, you can depend on them in your problems and can even find a solution by taking their advice as and when required. Whereas, the newer friends cannot be highly depended upon until you gain confidence in them and gaining the confidence requires a lot of time and effort to be taken by both the people. For example, if you stuck up in a situation like deciding the career, the old friends will contribute highly as they have known you for years and know the skills you possess. Thus, they will be helpful in suggesting you better solutions and options to have. The trust between the two will prevent them from giving any kind of wrong advice.
There is also the emotional factor present between the two. It can be said that the there is a better emotional attachment with the old friends as compared to the newer ones. The older friends will be much more emotionally caring to you. For example, if you are caught up with some family problem which you cannot discuss openly with anyone. In such times, it will not only be easier to discuss your personal problems with them but also these are the people who can contribute to your problems. If there is a close attachment between them, they may even come forward to take up any social responsibility in the time of crisis. Such is the value of maintaining old friendships.
Though the older friendships should be valued, at the same time one should also opt for making newer friends. As we are social animals, the interaction with new people is necessary for our own development. It demonstrates the social quotient present within us. As we get to know new people, we come across newer experiences which at some point of time be crucial in the life ahead.
In the conclusion, it can be said that the old friends are equally important to keep as newer friends. Both have their own uniqueness and will contribute to our development in their own ways.
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 30
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your rea 30
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons 70
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 75
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ingly. They will try to suit you better as compared to the new friends. This will ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64655172414 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48575011347 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446120689655 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8267362768 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8518518519 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1851851852 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92592592593 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234382319357 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700761155787 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101703987148 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147644248263 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720571521637 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.