The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner.
"Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels."
The owner has mentioned a problem regarding the business events occurring in recent times in and around the plaza. The observations made are his view regarding the situation and does not post any factual information regarding the same. Overall the context does not post a rigid base relating the claims he has done.
Initially, the observation is that the shoppers have reduced along with an increase in the number of skateboarders. This claim has no facts and figures supporting it. It is not derived from an actual survey being conducted among the shop owners. Also, the owner is being histrionic by using ‘dramatically’ at the end of his statement. This feeling of his may have aroused due to his personal disliking about the sport. Providing a number instead of using ‘many shop owners’ would have created a detrimental effect. The decrease in sales may be due to different reasons like economic instability in the region, emerging of a new market neighbouring Central Plaza, etc. Occurring of the two events may just be a co-incidence and has nothing relating it.
Next is the problem of littering and vandalism in the Central Plaza. Skateboarding is a fun sport and there is no evidence provided for the problem arising due to it. Vandalism may be even related to increasing of criminal activity in the region. It is a law and order issue within the city and skateboarding cannot be blamed completely for this. Thus banning the sport is not a thoughtful decision taken by the authorities and may not necessarily increase the sales of shop owners.
A proper evaluation of the situation is required by the authorities of Central Plaza rather than just putting on the charges on the sport and upsetting the citizens to pursue the sport of their will.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | lanhhoang | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Jai1332 | 63 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | harshit kukreja | 69 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | Primace | 43 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | pallavipolas | 55 | view |
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a new factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 73
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrolment is growing and, based on current t 50
- Neighbours are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of good neighbour? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 66
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun shop seems to be countable; consider using: 'many shops'.
Suggestion: many shops
...oviding a number instead of using 'many shop owners' would have created a detri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 298.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98993288591 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0211948175 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2022278155 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4705882353 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.70786347227 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189467352108 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057260659116 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575465542305 0.0701772020484 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103991616802 0.128457276422 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438429999977 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.