The charts below give information about the people use public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of several reasons to use the public library in Britain in 1991 and 2001.
Overall, in both years the main reason for visiting a library was to borrow or return books. It also is clear that the percentage of people using these libraries to obtain information in 2000 was double the figure for 1991.
In 1991, 65% of visitors went to public libraries in order to borrow or return books. However, in 2000 there was a decline in the percentage, which saw a decrease by 10% to 55%, although a new category of borrowing or returning videos appearing in the chart for 2000 which accounted for 18% of the total.
The proportion for “study” and “obtain information” was equal, at 10% in 1991. The percentage increased by half for the reason of gaining information in 2000, but this fell dramatically to 2% for the “study” reason. Britain saw a considerable decline in the percentage of people went to public libraries to read newspapers or magazines, from 15% in 1991 to 5% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-29 | hoaitt@most.gov.vn | 86 | view |
- The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is a positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion. 89
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 72
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 89
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87150837989 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13533768099 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6661330225 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358421293424 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178328216425 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944993824975 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247363345318 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864282142345 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.