Every institution regardless commercial or not has its aims and goals. For educational institution the scope of the concern is limited to the quality of education. And this criterion stems from the essence of the educational institutions.
I disagree with the statement, mentioned in the paragraph, on the following points. Firstly, I think that every student is an individual with his unique personality. From this prospective, it is everyone’s natural responsibility to choose the future career or academic path. Whatever the ability of the student, his/her interests can differ from the ones the university would “force” them to choose. And from this point of view the intervention of the university is not justified.
Secondly, I think it is not the way of succeeding that appeals to the student. It is a question of motivation. It is a driving force which makes a non successful person to a successful one. And by not knowing the interests, the abilities and goals of a particular student, it is not as easy to prevent pursuing the field that best matches the intensions of the student as it seems. The interested person will always seek the opportunity to take the field that best matches him.
Finally I would like to mention that the potential of a person is not always fully developed in a particular settings of circumstances. If the environment is not an aspiring one, the potential of a student will be submerged. Revealing and assessing it is not a simple issue, and thus in many cases it can be underestimated.
To conclude, I would like to say that the intervention of the university into the decision of future field study of a particular student is not only unjust, but it carries the risk of underestimation of the students potential. This, itself, can lead to a wrong decision which will be reflected in the future career or academic experience.
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 59
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their older (15 to 18 year-old) teenage children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... take the field that best matches him. Finally I would like to mention that the potent...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'setting'?
Suggestion: setting
... always fully developed in a particular settings of circumstances. If the environment is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, i think, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 315.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99365079365 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22459682617 2.78398813304 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2424576818 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3888888889 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234595429125 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612700046331 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469193746307 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113832944476 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504835774612 0.0628817314937 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.