write a report describing the info below
The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans.
The diagram highlights the process by which aluminium cans are recycled.
It is noticeable that there are six stages involving in the recycling process, beginning with collecting aluminium cans and finishing with reusing recycled ones with many purposes.
Looking at the detail, the first step is that aluminium cans are collected by putting into some available bins in somewhere, which are only for aluminium one thus no need to be separated with other types of rubbish. The following step is that all collected aluminium cans undergo a process including being cleaned to get rid of a dirty surface, being sorted, being shredded into smaller bits and being continually compressed in many containers, which bring processed aluminium cans to a furnace. At the point, they are heated at a high temperature for a particular period of time.
Following this, while the aluminium bits are still too hot, they are transferred immediately to a rolled machine to make pieces of aluminium in the thickness of 2.5 mm to 6 mm. Having been recycled as new cans using for many types of beverage in factories, the products are widely reused in many shops and supermarkets. The interesting point is that 74% number of aluminium cans are recycled in the UK, making it significantly less wasted and protective the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-18 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | olimboy olimov | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | Clyde1 | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | olimboy olimov | 61 | view |
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 61
- the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries. 73
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... at a high temperature for a particular period of time. Following this, while the aluminium b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, still, thus, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84762493388 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9935512573 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148290268422 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726861610666 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404996302013 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108702716484 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179740091441 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.