Internet users as percentage of population.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of people who used the internet in three countries: the USA, Canada, Mexico during the period from 1999 to 2009.
At first glance, it is clear that there is an upward trend in all three nations throughout the given period. In addition, the percentage of internet users in Canada was the highest in comparison with that of the USA and Mexico at the end of the period.
Looking at the detail, as regarding Mexico, the number of Internet users began at the lowest figure in 1999, at around 5%. this was followed by a considerable increase in remaining years, at about 25% in 2005 and only 40% in 2009, making it considerably lower than the others. Likewise, there was also a rapid climb in the proportion of Internet user in the USA, with 20% in the first year, the went up by around 50% in 2005 and got the second highest figure in 2009, at approximately 80%.
As for Canada, nearly 10% of Canadians used the Internet in 1999. The figure increased sharply in the same proportion as Canada in 2005 before reaching the high of 80% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 87
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he lowest figure in 1999, at around 5%. this was followed by a considerable increase...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, likewise, look, regarding, second, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54358974359 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47936918023 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4349400272 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176116673008 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851000403106 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864123863278 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105162815186 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478209730328 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.