tpo-31- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both talk about a fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx which discovered in China. The reading suggests that Sinosauropteryx was not a feathered dinosaur; however, the professor states that the critics are persuasive.
The reading and the lecture first discuss about the skin. The reading claims that the fine line formed after the dinosaur died when its skin decomposed into fibers. The lecture, on the other hand, says that about the condition of volcano ash. She mentions the other animal in that environmental have functional skin structure which preserved there.
Second, the reading and the lecture talks about which part it would be. The reading claims that scientists are not sure what part of the dinosaur's anatomy the structures were. In contrast, the professor states that chemical analyses analysis the structure and they show it is contain Keratin so it would be feathers not frills.
Finally, the reading and the lecture discuss about flying. The reading points out that the structures which lines show are useless for flight; nevertheless, the speaker says that it can be possible. She talks about peacock as an example. They have feathers but cannot fly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dentista1985 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jiyakavya | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
- Tpo43 75
- tpo-44 70
- TPO-30-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific point made in the reading passage. 65
- tpo-42-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage. 60
- tpo-31- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both talk ab...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates that the critics are persuasive. The reading and the lecture first discus...
^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s that the critics are persuasive. The reading and the lecture first discuss a...
^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e lecture first discuss about the skin. The reading claims that the fine line forme...
^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d when its skin decomposed into fibers. The lecture, on the other hand, says that a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...skin structure which preserved there. Second, the reading and the lecture talk...
^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...cientists are not sure what part of the dinosaurs anatomy the structures were. In contras...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'analyses'' or 'analysis's'?
Suggestion: analyses'; analysis's
...ast, the professor states that chemical analyses analysis the structure and they show it...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contained'.
Suggestion: contained
...lysis the structure and they show it is contain Keratin so it would be feathers not fri...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n so it would be feathers not frills. Finally, the reading and the lecture dis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2193877551 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62518220942 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5762735162 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6923076923 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285781684439 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104174274156 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797568402408 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184113292931 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375255322484 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.